Prevention efforts provide no panacea on health costs
Wall Street Journal, June 12, 2009
While lawmakers agree that a bigger government role in disease prevention is needed to fix the healthcare system, such efforts have had little success in reducing illness or costs. "It is not going to cut costs," said Louise Russell, a research professor in the Institute for Health at Rutgers University who has studied the issue. "We already do a lot more prevention than other countries. We are not healthier." The findings don't question the benefits of a healthy lifestyle, the problem is that when testing becomes too widespread, or heavy investments are made in monitoring people with chronic diseases, the rewards often fail to match the costs.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
