Divided AMA Compromises on Health Reform Resolution
The former AMA delegate who predicted the physician group's membership would "drop like a stone" because of statements suggesting they oppose a public plan, now says he is somewhat relieved that the group's Wednesday resolution will "at least keep them at the table" of health reform debate.
"At least they realized that the first statement was a mistake," says David Priver, a San Diego obstetrician gynecologist and California Medical Association delegate.
AMA delegates this week spent several hours in an emotional debate–one member who was there called it "knockdown, drag out"–between left wing and right wing members who disagreed over how to weigh in their voice on President Barack Obama's push for a public plan. And support for "a public option" was language that was included in the wording of one of several proposed resolutions they agreed to consider.
"It broke down between the right and the left," says Robert Hertzka, MD, a moderate California delegate to the AMA. "The right outnumber the left, but people on the left are about as loud as the people on the right," he said yesterday in an airport bound for home.
Some were concerned that not supporting a public plan "makes it seem like we like Aetna, when we just filed three lawsuits against health plans," he says.
In the end, the delegates were tired and out of time, and outgoing president Nancy Nielsen, MD, took the microphone. They all want reform, she told the crowd, but she suggested they just stick with the language in place in a previous resolution. That resolution did not include mention of a public option.
They voted, just as the delegates were about to lose the conference hall, Hertzka says.
The new resolution says the following: The organization supports "health system reform alternatives that are consistent with AMA principles of pluralism, freedom of choice, freedom of practice and universal access for patients."
"People on the left and right really felt like they had fought a war. They felt something dramatic had happened," Hertzka describes.
But other doctors are still disenchanted with the AMA for not specifically advocating a public plan as the Obama administration is pushing.
"The AMA has a large denial problem," says Joe Scherger, MD, vice president for primary care at Eisenhower Medical Center, near Palm Desert, CA. and an AMA member.
"They're not facing the huge healthcare cost problem, and that's the problem that's crippling America," says Scherger. "What is the AMA doing to respond to what is happening in McAllen TX, where a map of medical expenses finds them charging more than all but one other region of the country, apparently because physicians are giving too much care?
"Nothing," he said.
"There's nothing new in their new statement, at all," he said.
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- MGMA Urges 'End-to-End' ICD-10 Testing
- Telehealth Improves Patient Care in ICUs
- 1 in 5 CT Screenings for Lung Cancer Results in Overdiagnosis
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- LifePoint Bolsters Presence in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big