Physicians
PhysicianLeaders
e-Newsletter
Blogs
Industry Surveys
Breakthroughs Reports
Events
Sponsored
Departments Add News Widget

Radiology Groups: Recommended Mammogram Guidelines Will Increase Breast Cancer Deaths

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media, November 17, 2009

Angry radiology groups are blasting a government panel's recommendations that women ages 40 to 49 forgo annual screening mammograms and that women between age 50 and 74 should have screening mammograms only once every other year rather than annually.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review of literature advises that women over age 74 should stop all breast cancer screening because the practice lacks evidence of clinical benefit, and found that breast self-examination "does not reduce breast cancer mortality." The task force also noted the increased risk of false positives and other kinds of harm that result from medical overtreatment of abnormal findings that would never have caused death.

But officials for the Access to Medical Imaging Coalition (AMIC) and the American College of Radiology immediately jumped on the task force guidelines, calling them "shocking" and an attempt to "ration care." They said that if incorporated into reimbursement policies by government insurers and payers, many avoidable breast cancer deaths will occur.

"Two decades of decline in breast cancer mortality could be reversed and countless American women may die needlessly from breast cancer each year," according to a statement from the ACR. "Mammography is not a perfect test, but it has unquestionably been shown to save lives—including in women aged 40-49," said Carol H. Lee, MD, ACR chair.

"They say it's not cost efficient. Well, we're not comfortable putting a price tag on a woman's life," added Shawn Farley, ACR spokesman. Besides, he said, the typical mammogram reimbursement from Medicare is only $89. "That's one of the reasons why this (recommendation) is so perplexing."

W. Phil Evans, MD, president of the Society of Breast Imaging, said, "These recommendations are inconsistent with current science and apparently have been developed in an attempt to reduce costs."

"To tell women they should not get regular mammograms starting at 40, when this approach has overwhelmingly been shown to save lives, is shocking," Evans said. "At least 40% of the lives saved by mammographic screening are of women aged 40-49."

1 | 2
4 comments on "Radiology Groups: Recommended Mammogram Guidelines Will Increase Breast Cancer Deaths"


Stacy Woods (11/20/2009 at 10:06 AM)
I was 36 when I noticed something odd in a self breast exam. When I went to my doctor he did not notice anything. I was insistant on having a mammogram. Thankfully I did because it was discovered I had Stage II Breast Cancer. After a Mastectomy and Chemo I am doing well but I would not be here if I had waited to even 40. I know I am not one of only a few. I do not know what these people are thinking! I do know You have to be your own Advocate because nobody else will!

Barrie Brodrick (11/19/2009 at 7:45 PM)
I was diagnosed with breast cancer at 57, 10 months after having a normal mammogram. I found the lump myself. My cancer was so aggressive it had already moved to my lymph nodes. I have no history of breast cancer in my family. After surgery, chemo and radiation I am doing well. Under these new guidelines I would be one of the folks who may have not survived. They say self exams are of not use - yet I found my lump. And a mammogram every 2 years - I may be dead!!

Liz Miller (11/17/2009 at 3:35 PM)
My sister was diagnosed with Breast cancer at the age of 40years - found in a routine mammogram. She is a breast cancer survivor over 20 years - Please do not change the guidelines - lives will be lost...