MedPAC: Regional Variation in Service Use Not Same as Medicare Spending
Across the country, regional variation in service use is not equivalent to regional variation in Medicare spending, according to a new report compiled by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). In fact, "the two should not be confused," MedPAC noted in the report compiled for Congress, which has focused on variation and Medicare payments in both reform bills.
Medicare spending is considered the amount that Medicare spends for each beneficiary in a traditional fee for service program; this amount differs by geographic area.
However, service use is Medicare spending adjusted to remove the effects of differing wages, payment rates, and health status among geographic areas. The intent is to produce "a standardized measure of service use" to measure geographic variations. Service use varies at all geographic levels— including within states and among providers, according to MedPAC.
Many factors can drive service use, such as differences in physician practice patterns and care decisions, plus differences in beneficiaries' tendencies to seek care— including differences in supplemental insurance, according to MedPAC.
But service use among regions can vary "for more idiosyncratic reasons as well," as demonstrated by looking at the extremes: the metropolitan statistical area with the greatest service use—Miami-Dade County, FL—has twice the level of service use as the region with the lowest service use—non-metropolitan Hawaii, the report said.
The low service use in Hawaii, according to MedPAC, may reflect "unique characteristics and preferences that result in beneficiaries having similar levels" of physician outpatient visits, but lower levels of institutional (hospital, skilled nursing facility or hospice) care than in other parts of the country.
After making adjustments, reported service use in Miami-Dade County was nearly 40% higher than the national average and more than 10% higher than in any other large metropolitan area.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Premium Subsidy Fight Creating Uncertainty for Hospitals, Health Plans