Massachusetts AG Finds System-wide Insurer Payment Discrepancies
A Massachusetts attorney general's investigation into contracting between healthcare insurers and providers reveals "serious system-wide failings" that "threatens access to affordable, quality healthcare," according to a preliminary state report released today.
"Our review shows that the current system of healthcare payment is not always value-based and health care providers throughout the state are compensated at widely different rates for providing similar quality and complexity of services," said Attorney General Martha Coakley, who last week lost a widely followed U.S. Senate race to Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts.
The report showed that insurance companies pay some doctors and hospitals twice as much as others for similar care.
The report "raises concerns that existing systemic disparities in reimbursement may, over time, create a provider marketplace dominated by very expensive 'haves' as the lower and more moderately priced 'have nots' are forced to close or consolidate with higher paid systems," Coakley said following the yearlong investigation.
Coakley said the report outlines six key findings that have "powerful implications for the healthcare marketplace in Massachusetts":
- Prices paid by health insurance companies to hospitals and physician groups vary significantly within the same geographic area and among providers offering similar levels of service.
- Price variations for hospitals and physicians offering services are not explained by quality of care, sickness or complexity of the population being served; proportion of patients on Medicare or Medicaid; or whether the hospital is a teaching or research facility.
- Price variations are correlated to market leverage as measured by the relative market position of the hospital or provider group compared with other hospitals or provider groups within a geographic region or within a group of academic medical centers.
- Variations in providers' per month expenses are not correlated to the methodology used to pay for healthcare, with expenses sometimes higher for globally paid providers paid on a fee-for-service basis.
- Price increases, not increases in utilization, caused most of the healthcare cost increases during the past few years in Massachusetts.
- The commercial healthcare marketplace has been distorted by contracting practices that reinforce and perpetuate disparities in pricing.
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- Esther Dyson Launches Population Health Challenge
- Crisis Spurs Healthcare Payment Reform in Arkansas
- ICD-10 Delay Alters Provider, Vendor Prep
- Reform Puts Vise Grips on Physicians
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- Payment Reform Naysayers 'Better Wake Up'
- NPP Demand Rising Under Value-Based Care Models
- Reduce Readmissions by Activating Patients to Do 'Self-Care'