Stent risks are significant
Baltimore Sun, July 25, 2010
Coronary stents, which have became a multibillion-dollar medical industry, might not be as safe — or as effective — as once thought. But cardiologists are unclear about much more than simply whether stents have medical value, as evidenced by the case of Midei, who is accused of performing hundreds of unnecessary procedures yet is defended vociferously by patients and colleagues. Some doctors still argue over seemingly fundamental details, such as how to measure blockage on an X-ray, or when it is appropriate to choose surgery over stenting or medication. And now they have a new uncertainty to resolve: Will placing a stent lead to a patient's survival or the doctor's indictment?
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Healthcare Leaders Seek Strategic Sweet Spot
- 3 Reasons Wellness Programs Fail
- CMS Issues Health Insurance Exchange Proposed Rules
- Patients Shoulder Nearly 25% of Medical Bills
- ACOs Widespread, Yet Challenged
- MGMA: Physician Compensation Increasingly Based on Quality Measures
- HFMA: Patient Financial Interaction Guidelines Sharpened
- Data Collaborative Taps Predictive Analytics to Coordinate Care
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- HFMA: Revenue Cycle, Reimbursements Share the Spotlight
