Prior Authorization Hurts Patient Care, AMA Survey Finds
Requiring physicians to ask for preauthorization from health insurance companies harms patient care, and creates an expensive and confusing claims process, according to a national survey released by the American Medical Association.
"Intrusive managed care oversight programs that substitute corporate policy for physicians' clinical judgment can delay patient access to medically necessary care," said AMA Immediate Past President J. James Rohack, MD. "According to the AMA survey, 78% of physicians believe insurers use preauthorization requirements for an unreasonable list of tests, procedures and drugs."
The AMA said the national survey—released this week— of approximately 2,400 physicians is an attempt to quantify the burden of preauthorization mandates for a growing list of routine tests, procedures and drugs. Physicians complained that preauthorization delays or interrupts patient care, wastes time, and complicates medical decisions.
The survey found that:
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- Hospital Pricing Irks Nurses; More Jobs, Less Pay

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.
Todd (11/23/2010 at 10:32 AM)
This sure beats the alternative. Imagine no prior authorization? You would see premium increases year over year of 40% being common. What insurance plans and employers should do to compromise is not require prior authorization for patients having surgery at Joint Commission Accredited Hospitals in Thailand, India, Turkey, Korea, Singapore and Costa Rica.
Sara Gottschalk (11/23/2010 at 10:17 AM)
As the wife of a patient who was to undergo chemotherapy, I found myself fighting with an insurance company to justify the two heart tests required by a highly respected oncologist who could not determine chemotherapy medication until the tests determined the ability of his heart to withstand the chemo rounds. The insurance company could not correlate the relationship between chemo treatments and heart health! I shudder to think how many patients have legitimate claims denied because they do not have the expertise to fight their way through the system as I did[INVALID]especially at times when they are particularly vulnerable.