Malpractice Mediation Lacks Physician Participation
“Change will require medical leaders, hospital administrators, and malpractice insurers to temper their suspicion of the tort system sufficiently to approach medical errors and adverse events as learning opportunities, and to retain lawyers who embrace mediation as an opportunity to solve problems, show compassion, and improve care,” according to the study published in the Journal of Health, Politics, Policy and Law.
Researchers looked at 31 cases from 11 nonprofit hospitals in New York City in 2006 and 2007 that went to mediation. About 70 percent of the cases settled either during or after mediation, for amounts from $35,000 to $1.7 million.
The case for mediation would appear to be compelling in medical malpractice cases because:
- The outcome is under the parties’ control.
- Plaintiffs can receive payment soon after the harm instead of waiting years.
- Defendants do not have to pay outside lawyers to try the case.
- Members of the medical staff do not have to prepare for discovery and a trial.
- Even if mediation doesn’t resolve the case, it may create enough momentum to lead to a settlement.
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Uncompensated Care Faces a Double Hit in Some States
- Hospital Pricing Transparency a Marketing Game Changer
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists