RACs Intro 'Semi-Automated' Claims Reviews
Providers familiar with automated claims reviews and complex claims reviews by the recovery audit contractors (RAC) now face another method of overpayment identification: "Semi-automated" claims review.
Semi-automated review strays a bit from the automated and complex methods of overpayment identification recognized in the RAC statement of work, but is essentially a hybrid of the two primary techniques.
So with this new method, what exactly changes?
Not much, really. CMS breaks this new review process into two parts. The first piece of the two-part review process involves automated review of claims data to identify billing aberrancies with a high index of suspicion of improper payment.
The RAC statement of work says an automated review occurs when a determination of error is made at the system level without human review of the medical record. "The first part of the new process is essentially the data mining the RACs have done all along using their proprietary systems, and is very similar to automated reviews," says Kimberly Hoy, JD, CPC, director of Medicare and compliance at HCPro, Inc.
"The only exception being that identified claims only contain possible errors, rather than assumed errors, as in a standard automated review."
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- A Fresh Look at End-of-Life Care
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle