RACs Intro 'Semi-Automated' Claims Reviews
Providers familiar with automated claims reviews and complex claims reviews by the recovery audit contractors (RAC) now face another method of overpayment identification: "Semi-automated" claims review.
Semi-automated review strays a bit from the automated and complex methods of overpayment identification recognized in the RAC statement of work, but is essentially a hybrid of the two primary techniques.
So with this new method, what exactly changes?
Not much, really. CMS breaks this new review process into two parts. The first piece of the two-part review process involves automated review of claims data to identify billing aberrancies with a high index of suspicion of improper payment.
The RAC statement of work says an automated review occurs when a determination of error is made at the system level without human review of the medical record. "The first part of the new process is essentially the data mining the RACs have done all along using their proprietary systems, and is very similar to automated reviews," says Kimberly Hoy, JD, CPC, director of Medicare and compliance at HCPro, Inc.
"The only exception being that identified claims only contain possible errors, rather than assumed errors, as in a standard automated review."
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Hospital Groups Strike Back at Hospital Rating Systems
- AHIP: Enormity of HIX Challenges Sinks In
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers