Intelligence Unit
Special Reports
Special Events
Subscribe
Sponsored
Departments
- Leadership
- Finance
- Technology
- Physicians
- Community Hospitals
- Health Plans
- Marketing
- Quality
- Nursing
- HR
Follow Us
Not-for-Profit Provider Outlook 'Negative,' Says Moody's
The economy is still too soft to change the negative outlook for not-for-profit healthcare providers in the United States in 2012, and that outlook may stay negative "for at least the next several years," says a report from Moody's Investors Service.
The bond rating agency's healthcare group is holding firm to the negative outlook it has maintained since 2008, based largely on issues that are beyond the control of providers.
The main reasons for the continued negative outlook include modest revenue growth for hospitals over the next 18 months, an expectation of continued "softness" in the economy, and challenges created by the care, payment, and regulatory transitions mandated by the Affordable Care Act, Moody's said.
"While performance in the sector is expected to remain variable in 2012, with certain organizations performing well despite the challenges, the preponderance of credit factors facing the industry is unequivocally negative, and is expected to remain negative for at least the next several years," the report stated.
Lisa Martin, senior vice president of Moody's Healthcare Group, says that any change in the dour outlook will depend upon what happens in the larger economy.
- Patient Harm Data to Remain on Medicare's Hospital Compare Site
- CMS Seeks to 'Rapidly Reduce' Medicare Spending with $1B in Grants
- Quiet ORs Better for Patient Safety
- Hard-Nosed About Physician Teamwork
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Tavenner Confirmed as CMS Administrator
- Case Study: Advance Care Conversations
- Leapfrog Hospital Safety Scores 'Depressing'
- CMS Releases Hospital Pricing Data
- Esther Dyson's Population Health Dream
Comments are moderated. Please be patient.
bob (1/27/2012 at 9:45 AM)
I share Bruce McPherson's optimism. Clearly, there will be less income, but that is a necessary good thing for the economy, especially when leading providers are able to reduce expenditures without adverse impact on access as well as positive impact on quality....like so many are demonstrating.