Why do cardiologists often pass up safe, low-tech treatments for chest pain?
The Washington Post, February 7, 2012
Can American doctors say "No" to an aggressive and high-tech treatment they're used to providing even when it turns out a less heroic and cheaper one works just as well? It's an important question. The affordability of American medical care in the future will depend, in part, on the ability of physicians to simplify and economize, which are two things they've never been good at. With national health expenditures amounting to $2.6 trillion a year—45 percent of it paid by government—prosperity and political stability may also be at stake.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- CMS Seeks to 'Rapidly Reduce' Medicare Spending with $1B in Grants
- Quiet ORs Better for Patient Safety
- Hospital Pricing Data Dump Won't Hurt You, Yet
- CMS Releases Hospital Pricing Data
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Telemedicine is Retail Health Clinics' Newest Tool
