Medicare Patients Given Fewer Treatment Options
More than one-third of Medicare patients who underwent a prostatectomy, and 90% who had elective insertion of a coronary stent, said their physicians gave them no advance information about more conservative options that produce similar survival outcomes, says a survey conducted by the Dartmouth Institute and the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation.
The results indicate that rather than guide patients to thoughtfully consider alternatives, physicians are still paternalistically making those decisions for their patients—without discussion—on grounds that they think they know what's best for their patients, says principal investigator Floyd J. Fowler.
"There's a big tradition of physicians taking responsibility, and being paternalistic when these decisions are made," Fowler says. "I won't argue that they weren't trying to be beneficent when they made these decisions, but we think this is not the way decisions like this should be made," especially when the invasive procedures in question carry considerable risks and side-effects.
The paper by Fowler and colleagues is published in the March 2 issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine.
- 'Kafkaesque' Value System Unfairly Penalizes Doctor Pay
- Proton Beam Therapy Poised for Growth in US
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- 4 Crucial Tactics for Reining in Healthcare Cost
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- How, and Why, to Recruit Male Nurses
- Docs Fret as HHS Addresses Malpractice Reporting 'Loopholes'
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013