Removing doctors in settlements can deflect oversight
Medical malpractice attorneys who represent patients' families say that removing doctors as defendants has increasingly become a common negotiating tactic for hospitals' attorneys in reaching settlements in such cases in southwestern Pennsylvania—particularly with UPMC. "If a case is settled under the doctor's name, it has to be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank," said Veronica Richards, a Pittsburgh medical malpractice attorney who represents patients and patients' families. "So [removing the doctors] is a way for the hospital to protect the doctor." The information in the data bank is then used by hospitals in assessing whether to hire a doctor and by state medical boards in deciding whether to discipline a doctor.
- Governors Push to Expand Role of PAs, Telemedicine
- 3 More Pioneer ACOs Say They Will Quit
- Why Open Payments Irks Physicians
- Telemetry Overuse Cost Health System $4.8 Million in One Year
- Ebola in the U.S.: Reason to Fear, to Hope, to Prepare
- Overcoming a Payer Mix 'Nightmare'
- Top Provider Billing Mistakes Are Changing
- Difficult Patients: It's Not Them, It's You, Doctor
- IV Fluids Shortage Continues
- Employee Engagement: Make It Meaningful