Should we expand imperfect treatments, or create new ones?
The Atlantic, July 5, 2012
We will need to ask ourselves whether medicine—both clinical practice and scientific research—should focus on the development of novel treatments or instead on ensuring that existing treatments are effectively used. Health should be thought of as a function of two attributes: potential health—a matter of identifying the best medical outcome available—and attained health, or how close we come to achieving this goal. When advocates of attained health survey the landscape, they see an appalling misallocation of resources. They see a lot of money being used—in both research and practice—to produce what are often only slight advances at best in potential health.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- CMS Seeks to 'Rapidly Reduce' Medicare Spending with $1B in Grants
- Quiet ORs Better for Patient Safety
- Hospital Pricing Data Dump Won't Hurt You, Yet
- CMS Releases Hospital Pricing Data
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- Telemedicine is Retail Health Clinics' Newest Tool
