Privatized prison healthcare scrutinized
The Washington Post, July 23, 2012
About 20 states, including Arizona, Illinois and Maryland, have shifted all or portions of their prison healthcare operations to private providers in an attempt to cut costs, a trend that is raising concerns among unions and prisoners' rights groups. Officials in the states say the companies—which provide medical, dental, mental and pharmaceutical services—are less expensive than employing state workers, in part because using them saves on benefits and pension costs. Human rights groups, however, say that private operators are not always providing care that is as good or better than what the state could do.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Healthcare Leaders Seek Strategic Sweet Spot
- 3 Reasons Wellness Programs Fail
- CMS Issues Health Insurance Exchange Proposed Rules
- Patients Shoulder Nearly 25% of Medical Bills
- ACOs Widespread, Yet Challenged
- MGMA: Physician Compensation Increasingly Based on Quality Measures
- HFMA: Patient Financial Interaction Guidelines Sharpened
- HFMA: Revenue Cycle, Reimbursements Share the Spotlight
- Data Collaborative Taps Predictive Analytics to Coordinate Care
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
