Commentary: Why 'quality' care is dangerous
The Obama administration is working with Congress to mandate that all Medicare payments be tied to "quality metrics," but an analysis of this drive for better healthcare reveals a fundamental flaw in how quality is defined and metrics applied, according to this opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal. In too many cases, the quality measures have been hastily adopted, only to be proven wrong and even potentially dangerous to patients, the authors write.
- Senators Hear How Two-Midnight Rule Harms Patients, Hospitals
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Handshaking Spreads Germs. Get Over It.
- Healthcare Costs Start With What We Eat
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- Hospitals Likely to Outsource ICD-10 at Launch
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- Anatomy of 3 Health System Rebranding Efforts