MRSA Infects 5% of ED Patients
One in 20 patients in a Boston emergency department tested positive for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and of these more than half carried MRSA on multiple sites, according to a study published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine.
"Ours is one of the first studies to test patients in the ER for MRSA regardless of their reason for being there," said principal author Kalpana Gupta, MD, of the Boston Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
While it's too costly to test all patients for MRSA who present in the emergency room, or to make it a standard practice, a better way to prevent transmission within the hospitalis to make sure patients and providers wash their hands, his team advised.
"The ED is frequently used by patients with complaints of skin and soft tissue infections," and MRSA is the most common recovered causative pathogen in these patients, the authors wrote. What's also of concern is the asymptomatic patient, who can have a reserve of bacteria that's easily transmitted.
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Hospital Pricing Transparency a Marketing Game Changer
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Uncompensated Care Faces a Double Hit in Some States
- Hospitals Profit On Bloodstream Infections
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.
tom engle (1/19/2011 at 10:44 AM)
Haven't you misrepresented the MRSA study? It is not 1 in 20 patients, rather 1 in 20 patients who present with skin infections?