MRSA Infects 5% of ED Patients
One in 20 patients in a Boston emergency department tested positive for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and of these more than half carried MRSA on multiple sites, according to a study published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine.
"Ours is one of the first studies to test patients in the ER for MRSA regardless of their reason for being there," said principal author Kalpana Gupta, MD, of the Boston Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
While it's too costly to test all patients for MRSA who present in the emergency room, or to make it a standard practice, a better way to prevent transmission within the hospitalis to make sure patients and providers wash their hands, his team advised.
"The ED is frequently used by patients with complaints of skin and soft tissue infections," and MRSA is the most common recovered causative pathogen in these patients, the authors wrote. What's also of concern is the asymptomatic patient, who can have a reserve of bacteria that's easily transmitted.
- Urologists 'Outraged' Over PSA Test Challenge
- New Facebook Page Gathers Stories of Medical Harm
- Luxury Hospital Facilities Put Patient Experience First
- Five Hospitals Share Three Secrets to Improve Knee Surgery Outcomes
- Heartland Health Joins Mayo Clinic Network
- Beleaguered Fairview Health CEO to Retire in July
- Health Insurance Exchanges Put Defined Benefits to the Test
- Challenging Physicians to Help Improve the ED
- For hospitals and insurers, new fervor to cut costs
- The Power of Plugged-In Physicians


Comments are moderated. Please be patient.
tom engle (1/19/2011 at 10:44 AM)
Haven't you misrepresented the MRSA study? It is not 1 in 20 patients, rather 1 in 20 patients who present with skin infections?