1 in 3 Hospitalized Patients Suffers an Adverse Event
Just when you thought you and your fellow providers have made hospitals safer, the April edition of the journal Health Affairs publishes a series of reports that might change your mind.
At least a dozen separate reports in the quality- themed issue focus on how bad the system still is, and how much it needs to improve. Worse, as at least one study emphasizes, healthcare providers in large part are unaware how many harmful errors they still make.
In one report, researchers who studied three methods to detect serious adverse events conclude that the commonly used method of voluntary reporting and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Patient Safety Indicators capture only one-tenth of these flaws in care.
On the other hand, a newer tool developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, called the Global Trigger Tool, now used by only 2% of hospitals in the U.S., caught all 10.
Specifically, the GTT detected 354 adverse events, while the AHRQ system, used by roughly half the hospitals in the U.S., found only 35 and the voluntary method found just four, according to the authors. These adverse events include medication errors, procedural errors and hospital-acquired infections, pulmonary venous thromboembolisms, pressure ulcers, device failures and patient falls.
"Overall, adverse events occurred in 33.2% of hospital admissions (range: 29% to 36%) or 91 events per 1,000 patient days," says the lead author, David Classen, MD, associate professor of medicine at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.
Imagine telling a hospital patient on admission that they have a one in three risk of suffering some harm from an error unrelated to the condition or disease that brought them there. It's almost enough to make you forget about accountable care organizations, or that there ever was talk about bending the cost curve.
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- Esther Dyson Launches Population Health Challenge
- Crisis Spurs Healthcare Payment Reform in Arkansas
- Reform Puts Vise Grips on Physicians
- ICD-10 Delay Alters Provider, Vendor Prep
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- NPP Demand Rising Under Value-Based Care Models
- Payment Reform Naysayers 'Better Wake Up'
- Reduce Readmissions by Activating Patients to Do 'Self-Care'