RI police, hospitals at odds in medical privacy debate
Rhode Island Hospital's records department rejected the court order –– and answered the subsequent subpoena by saying the law allowed 20 days to respond. A Providence detective investigating an alleged murder requested the medical records of the victim, who died at Rhode Island Hospital. In his request for the records in March 2010 -- nearly two years after the death –– the detective included a copy of the victim's death certificate, plus two signed releases from the man's father and adult son. Rhode Island Hospital refused. The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act was designed to protect the privacy of medical databases and imposes hefty fines against those who release patients' protected information. Even so, the federal law allows the release of some information to law enforcement, such as when the police need to identify a suspect, fugitive or material witness, or when the police are investigating whether a patient is a victim of a crime. States have their own versions of patient privacy laws, and Rhode Island's Health Care Confidentiality Law, written in 1978 and adapted over the years, is even more restrictive than the federal law.
- Urologists 'Outraged' Over PSA Test Challenge
- New Facebook Page Gathers Stories of Medical Harm
- Luxury Hospital Facilities Put Patient Experience First
- Five Hospitals Share Three Secrets to Improve Knee Surgery Outcomes
- Heartland Health Joins Mayo Clinic Network
- Beleaguered Fairview Health CEO to Retire in July
- Health Insurance Exchanges Put Defined Benefits to the Test
- Challenging Physicians to Help Improve the ED
- For hospitals and insurers, new fervor to cut costs
- The Power of Plugged-In Physicians

