Medicare Rule May Discourage Brain CTs in ED
Headache patients who come to the ED could die or become permanently disabled for lack of a brain CT to detect hemorrhage or tumors, all because of a new Medicare quality rule poised to take effect Jan. 1.
That may sound overly dramatic. But anger over the coming rule echoed through many sessions of the American College of Emergency Physicians scientific assembly in San Francisco this week.
Robert C. Solomon, MD, a member of ACEP's board and a member of the faculty in the emergency medicine residency program at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh, is one doctor who insists that death and permanent disability are exactly what will happen if the proposed rule takes effect.
Without a CT, aneurysms that should be surgically repaired will go unseen, he says. Subtle bleeds will go undetected. "Patients are going to suffer harm as a result of this," he told me in an interview.
Starting Jan. 1, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services wants to apply the Quality Data Reporting Program to cover orders of brain CT on beneficiaries whose chief complaint is headache in the absence of an obvious traumatic event.
Exclusions would apply for patients with dizziness, paresthesia, lack of coordination, subarachnoid hemorrhage or abrupt onset "thunderclap" headaches, those who undergo lumbar punctures, or those admitted or transferred to an acute care hospital.
CMS's final rule is expected in the next two weeks. Eventually, ACEP officials say, hospital scores will determine Medicare payment adjustments, up or down, because that has been the CMS' stated goal.
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Uncompensated Care Faces a Double Hit in Some States
- Hospital Pricing Transparency a Marketing Game Changer

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.
Scott Stroming (10/22/2011 at 6:01 PM)
I would be happy to order fewer tests if the feds make it illegal to sue me
Steven Meyerson, MD (10/21/2011 at 12:49 AM)
There is solid evidence that brain CTs are of no value for patients with syncope who lack neurological signs or symptoms yet nearly all of them have a CT ordered. This applies to other neuro diagnostics ordered for syncope as well. This should be a target for eliminating unnecessary and harmful testing. It's not rationing. It's applying medical knowledge to overcome fear of being sued for not ordering a test - even if it has been proven to be useless.
W. C. Dandridge, Jr. M. D. MBA, FACS (10/20/2011 at 5:02 PM)
Well it's starting. Rationing of health care.