Stop Using In-Hospital Mortality Rates to Judge Quality
How should hospitals count patient deaths to measure quality?
Medicare now includes just those that happen within 30 days for three disease categories, and posts those scores on Hospital Compare, a number it soon will use to determine payment of Value Based Purchasing incentives starting in 2014.
A death on day 29, the hospital might look bad. A death on day 31, and the organization shines. It seems to be a reasonable cutoff, since most deaths for heart attack, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia patients happen within 30 days.
But a paper published Tuesday in the Annals of Internal Medicine, which examined nearly 3.5 million Medicare admissions, highlights a stunning weakness in the method by which many, if not most, other payers measure quality through fatal outcomes.
It turns out they don't look that hard at 30-day mortality. Instead, health plans and some states that measure quality in death look just at the number of patients who expired within the hospital's walls during their stay. That number has dropped rapidly as the mean length of stay has declined significantly across the country, by 25% or more in recent years.
And as you can probably surmise, hospitals that have policies, practices, and procedures resulting in shorter lengths of stay (or that are quicker to transfer or discharge certain candidates with poor prognoses) have lower in-hospital deaths than hospitals that keep patients longer. And yes, these organizations look better when their death rates are compared with hospitals that keep patients longer.
- Urologists 'Outraged' Over PSA Test Challenge
- New Facebook Page Gathers Stories of Medical Harm
- Luxury Hospital Facilities Put Patient Experience First
- Five Hospitals Share Three Secrets to Improve Knee Surgery Outcomes
- Heartland Health Joins Mayo Clinic Network
- Beleaguered Fairview Health CEO to Retire in July
- Health Insurance Exchanges Put Defined Benefits to the Test
- Challenging Physicians to Help Improve the ED
- For hospitals and insurers, new fervor to cut costs
- The Power of Plugged-In Physicians


Comments are moderated. Please be patient.
Carl Denney (1/6/2012 at 1:15 PM)
Mortality is best measured by 30-day all cause mortality. The problem is that hospitals have no reliable way to know if someone died after discharge. Hospitals also do not know if someone was discharged from their hospital, readmitted to a different facility, expiring or discharged to expire later.<br><br> Medicare data have the 30-day mortality included because of the tie to Social Security. Whenever a Medicare beneficiary dies, Social Security is notified, and from that, the days from discharge to date of death is added to the CMS data.<br><br> I think most hospitals/payers would agree that 30-day all-cause mortality is best, they just have no mechanism for accomplishing that. By the way, your captcha is frequently impossible for this human to read.