Hospital partnerships don’t have to be mergers
Observer-Dispatch, February 28, 2012
Officials at St. Elizabeth Medical Center and Faxton St. Luke's Healthcare have said they want to get closer. They've even mentioned the "m" word—merger. But there are lots of ways hospitals can get cozy without the full commitment of a full-asset merger. The Utica hospitals already have tried the low-commitment collaboration, in which they work together on certain services, most notably the Mohawk Valley Heart Institute. They simply could expand this kind of partnership. But other options include an affiliation (for those who like their independence), the creation of a parent corporation (for commitment and independence) or a full-asset acquisition (for a dominant partner who wants control).
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- Uncompensated Care Faces a Double Hit in Some States
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
