30-Day Readmissions Rule Under Two-Pronged Attack

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , March 29, 2012

Five months before Medicare's hospital readmission penalties take effect, two groups of authors say Congress and the government are taking the wrong approach.

Although the authors make different points, each says that the regulation, embedded in the Affordable Care Act, won't accomplish its intent. Both are published in Perspectives in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.

"Policymakers' emphasis on 30-day readmissions is misguided for three reasons," says one article "Thirty-Day Readmissions—Truth or Consequences," by Karen Joynt, MD, and Ashish Jha, MD, of the Harvard School of Public Health.

  1. Preventability. Only a small portion of readmissions up to 30 days after discharge are preventable, patient and community factors—like poor mental health or poor social support and poverty—drive much of what impacts readmissions and high rates of readmissions may in fact mean better quality of care.
  2. There are better policies to effect lower readmissions.
  3. Hospitals may spend energy on reducing readmissions at the expense of efforts to improve patient safety and other quality improvement projects.

Finally, Joynt and Jha wrote, very few of the millions of readmissions being targeted are actually preventable, ranging from at best 59%, but more realistically 12% when clinical data was obtained.

1 | 2 | 3

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.


MOST POPULAR

SPONSORED REPORTS
SPONSORED HEADLINES

SIGN UP

FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine

SPONSORSHIP & ADVERTISING

100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027

800-727-5257

About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2014 a division of BLR All rights reserved.