Medicaid Expansion Now in States' Hands
Hospitals are facing a showdown with state officials over the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on the expansion of Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Last week the court ruled that states couldn't be coerced into agreeing to the expansion, which would have added an estimated 17 million to the Medicaid rolls. Instead, states may simply decide not to participate in the expansion, which is 100% financed with federal funds for the first three years and then 90% covered for the next seven.
Almost immediately after the release of the Supreme Court decision Republican-led states began announcing that they would not participate in the expansion. In Florida, which was behind the legal challenge to the Medicaid expansion and where four million people are uninsured, Gov. Rick Scott (R) at first suggested that he might be amenable to the expansion, but by Monday stood firmly opposed to it.
- Critical Times for Small and Rural Hospitals
- 2015 OPPS Proposed Rule Detailed
- 4 Hot Healthcare Exec Titles; 1 Not
- Providence, Swedish Health Launch Employer-Driven ACO
- Physician Pay Increasingly Linked to Value-based Metrics
- Fees Lurk in Health Plans' Shift to e-Payments
- MU Slides into Summer of Discontent
- Advanced EHRs Save 10% Per Patient, Study Says
- Doc Shortage 'Fix' Is a Disaster Waiting to Happen
- Infuriated by MOC Rules, Physicians Unleash on Certification Boards