PPACA's Impact on Quality of Care Isn't Getting Its Due
Like most of you, I've been reading everything I can to understand the varying views on the Supreme Court justices' decision to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Yes, I have no life.
But what I haven't seen much about—dare I say anything—is that in upholding most of the law, the court validates its many pages that improve and streamline provider quality and safety of care. Even if the individual mandate had been tossed aside, there are more than 40 sections of the law that critically affect how we measure and pay for, and improve, quality of care.
By that I mean the healthcare that improves outcomes without harming patients in the process.
Quibble with the metrics or don't; they're pretty darn important. For it wouldn't matter much if we expanded access and made healthcare cheaper if the care that was provided was deficient, needless, inappropriate, or even harmful.
It is, after all, called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- In PCMH, the 'P' is Not for 'Physician'
- Six Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives