Hospitals' Adverse Event Reporting Systems Inadequate
An Office of Inspector General's report last week again poked holes in the credibility of the nation's hospital patient harm reporting system. After analyzing clinical records for Medicare beneficiaries treated by 189 hospitals, the agency determined those hospitals had reported only 1% of adverse events.
Four sentences of this report are of particular interest:
1. "To date, no Federal standards require States to operate adverse event reporting systems."
2. Half the states do not operate adverse event reporting systems to monitor the occurrence of harmful events in hospitals.
3. The 25 states and the District of Columbia that do have reporting standards "varied as to whether they made reporting voluntary or mandatory, what types of events they specified should be reported, and what additional information they asked hospitals to report."
4. "Hospital administrators indicated that staff often did not report events because they identified them not as patient harm, but rather as expected side effects."
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- CNO on Hospital Redesign: 'You Can't Over-Communicate'
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- Antibiotic Overuse a 'Huge Threat' to Patient Safety, Says CDC
- Carondelet to Pay $35M to Settle Fraud Allegations
- CHS Hacked, 4.5M Patient Records Compromised