No Final Guidance on Unsecure PHI—Yet
HHS failed to meet its August 18 HITECH Act deadline for final guidance on unsecure PHI.
Talk about "unsecure PHI" talk comes down to this—if patient information escapes your backdoor, is it protected by these standards? If it is, then you've got a "safe harbor" for avoiding breach notification.
If it isn't, then you're talking breach notification—to the individual, HHS, and possibly local media (the latter if it involves at least 500 patient records).
John C. Parmigiani, president of John C. Parmigiani & Associates, LLC, in Ellicott, MD, says encryption of patient records today is a necessity rather than an "add-on." He adds that patients now have a "growing concern" for the appropriate safeguarding of their personal and medical information and are calling for organizations to mitigate data leakages and losses.
"The need to encrypt and the provision to notify have become standard ingredients of the many state data protection laws," Parmigiani says. "They have been reinforced by not only the recent CMS report of its findings from the 'Security Rule compliance reviews' but also in the original HITECH wording and the subsequent HHS guidance in April."
- EHR Systems 'Immature, Costly,' AMA Says
- Anthem Blue Cross, 7 CA Health Systems Create New Challenger, Business Model
- Interstate Medical Licensure Effort Advances
- Better HCAHPS Scores Protect Revenue
- Data Points to Boom in Private HIX
- How to Build a Health Plan from Scratch
- CEO Exchange: Preparing for Population Health
- Narrow Networks Cut Costs, Not Quality, Economists Say
- Few Winners Among MSSP Participants
- Insurers see cost hikes in Partners HealthCare (MA) mergers