The Role Software Vendors Must Play to Ensure a Smooth Transition to ICD-10
The healthcare industry may have two years longer than originally expected to complete the transition to ICD-10, but the 2013 effective date established by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services leaves no room for procrastination.
The transition impacts all segments of the industry, but it will be providers that are the most affected. In addition to getting their own systems and processes in place to accommodate the expanded code set, they must also be prepared to accommodate any variances in transition schedules among payers and vendors.
Indeed, a significant challenge confronting many provider organizations is a lack of definitive information from vendors—technology vendors in particular—that they need to establish strategic transition plans and budgets. The vendor community may be in the midst of its own transition planning, but it has a broader responsibility and immediate role to play in ensuring its healthcare clients can embark on a smooth, seamless and successful move to ICD-10.
For example, provider organizations need to know now:
- If their existing systems can support ICD-10.
- The cost of any necessary upgrades or replacements to achieve ICD-10 compatibility.
- Whether or not upgrades will be covered by existing contracts.
- If compatible upgrades or replacements will be available within the necessary timeframe.
- Whether existing systems are capable of operating in both ICD-9 and ICD-10 environments to accommodate the transition schedules of payers and billing vendors.
A Call to Action
Providers have not been silent about their concerns regarding vendor readiness and cooperation as they embark on their ICD-10 transition planning. In fact, 55% of hospital CIOs surveyed by the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives identified these as the top hurdles to achieving compliance with the new code and transaction set.
That survey also found that 60% of CIOs had not been alerted to vendor implementation timelines. Further, 72% didn't know if their vendors would include ICD-10 in annual software upgrades, and 53% t didn't know if the changes would be covered by "federal and state" clauses in their contracts. These clauses generally leave vendors responsible for government-related software updates.
Physicians are also concerned about IT vendor readiness, and with good reason. A survey of physician practices by the Medical Group Management Association found that 95% would, at the very least, require software upgrades to ensure their practice management systems were compatible with ICD-10. Further, 64% indicated they would need to purchase code-selection software.
For these reasons, the healthcare industry is calling upon software vendors, particularly those whose applications link directly to the documentation, coding and billing processes, to take a proactive role in their clients' transition strategies. Top tier technology vendors are preparing now to answer that call—if they haven't already done so.
Proactive Vendor Engagement
In an ideal world, vendors would already have publicized their specific transition schedules. They would also step up to manage the heavy lifting by providing upgrades that allow clients to automatically produce coder-ready documentation appropriate for ICD-10. These upgrades would also accommodate the dual-coding environment that will likely be necessary during the early days of deployment.
In the real world, not every vendor is able or willing to do so. Nonetheless, vendors have a responsibility to at least inform their provider clients whether or not the systems they have in-house can support ICD-10, or if upgrades will be made available and the cost of those upgrades. Early notification is particularly important if systems are not and cannot be made ICD-10 compatible to allow clients ample time to undertake the lengthy process of identifying and installing replacements.
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Size Matters in Antibiotic Overuse
- Physicians Take SGR Repeal Message to Washington
- CDC Warns of Antibiotic Overuse in Hospitals
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers