Caution sounded on robot-aided prostate surgery
Boston Globe, October 14, 2009
A nationwide study raises serious concerns about robot-assisted prostate cancer surgery, a procedure that hospitals have widely advertised as having fewer complications than standard operations. Harvard Medical School researchers found that cancer patients who underwent minimally invasive prostate removal—now usually done with remote-controlled robots—were more than twice as likely to experience incontinence or impotence a year and a half after their operations than patients who had traditional surgery using an open incision.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- CMS Reveals Central Line Infection Rates, Finally
- Keeping Readmission Rates Low with Treatment Guidelines
- 5010 Logjam Means No Pay for Physicians
- Medicare Physician Payment Rule Factors in GPCI
- Leading Change is Tough from the Back of a Limo
- Feds Release Final Rules on Health Plan Language
- Getting to the Heart of Cardiology Alignment
- Engineering a High-Performance Emergency Department
- UnitedHealth will tie doctors' payments to quality of care
- Parkland Keeping Consultant's Analysis Under Wraps

