Skip to main content

The Self-Pay Conundrum: How to Balance Margin and Mission

 |  By HealthLeaders Media Staff  
   February 16, 2009

As hospitals watch their self-pay accounts receivable and bad debt increase, they find themselves in a bind. On the one hand, they know that the cost of collecting from patients is high, and that the likelihood of getting paid drops after patients leave the hospital. On the other hand, they must be sensitive to community relations and their social mission. These concerns have been heightened by adverse publicity regarding some nonprofit hospitals' collection practices and by efforts in some states to adopt legislation that will dictate the amount of charity care they must provide.

Many hospitals are looking for ways to collect part of a patient's bill either pre-service or at the point of service. But it's tricky to design such a process so that it deals fairly and consistently with patients without overburdening them financially. One way to approach this challenge is to use new kinds of technology that automate the process of estimating each patient's financial responsibility. Such programs can also help staff locate alternative sources of payment, develop realistic payment plans, and find financial assistance for those unable to pay.

Eligibility still a big problem

The first step in improving the self-pay collection process is to determine which patients can pay their bills and which will require financial assistance. This process starts with insurance eligibility verification. Many facilities still struggle with assigning the correct insurance coverage status to accounts on the front end. They may also fail to recognize that some patients' coverage has changed by the time bills are generated. The emerging trend is to check eligibility multiple times from preregistration through discharge. Doing so ensures that patient's insurance information for billing is always correct.

Traditionally, hospitals checked eligibility only once or only on specific patients to keep down per-transaction costs. However, some vendors now offer subscription-based services (unlimited online checks for a flat fee) that remove this economic barrier. Hospitals that switch from one-time eligibility checks to multiple verifications throughout the revenue cycle consistently find that 5% to 10% of self-pay accounts marked as "uncollectible" actually had coverage for the dates on which services were rendered.

Today's eligibility products have greater capabilities than those offered in the past. One example is the ability to present to staff not just a summary of patients' benefits, but also their year-to-date benefit accumulation status (e.g., deductible status, out-of-pocket status). This kind of additional information enables hospital staff to have a more informed financial counseling conversation with patients.

A decision tree for categorizing patients

Lack of insurance, a high deductible, or a balance after insurance does not mean that a patient cannot pay his bill. But patients have varying abilities and degrees of willingness to pay. So some of the self-pay collection programs assign a "propensity to pay" score to each account to consistently and objectively place a patient into the appropriate payment pathway.

For example, self-pay patients might be classified as follows:

  • Those who can pay their bill, and probably will
  • Those who can pay their bill, but mostly likely will not
  • Those who have the means to pay only a portion of their bill
  • Those who cannot pay their bill at all

Specialized vendors hired by hospitals use credit histories and other publicly available data to "score" a patient's ability and probability to pay. This credit check is a "soft hit" that does not affect the patient's credit score or credit history. The stratification scoring system should be customized to reflect each health system's patient population, instead of employing the data vendor's generic approach.

Propensity-to-pay scores can be used both as a pre-service financial clearance stratification tool and a back-end collection aid to determine whether an account should be worked in-house or outsourced to a collection agency. At the front end, account stratification helps financial aid counselors determine how to help patients meet their financial obligations. Specifically, it helps them decide which patients should be asked to pay and which should be further reviewed for charity, Medicaid, or other financial assistance.

If a patient has an elective procedure scheduled, it makes sense for hospital staff to check insurance eligibility and estimate the bill before calling the patient for preregistration. If the patient is defined as self-pay and his propensity-to-pay score indicates that he probably can meet his financial obligation, this is the best time to initiate a conversation about making a pre-service deposit.

Applying hospital collection policies fairly

An automated approach to self-pay collection has several advantages over ad hoc methods that rely on staffers' understanding of hospital policies. First, use of the latest advanced technology can greatly reduce the amount of staff time required to do the job properly. Second, automation makes it possible to apply hospital policies fairly and consistently across the board, minimizing the possibility that staffers will treat patients in a manner inconsistent with hospital policy or not deal with some of them at all. And third, patients are more satisfied with their hospital experience when they understand their financial responsibility before services are provided or before they are discharged. That way, they don't undergo "sticker shock" upon receiving their bill in the mail.

If a patient has the ability to pay, today's technology can create a pre-service estimated patient bill. The bill estimation process should take into account the payer's contractual allowable charge for services, as well as the patient's current benefits (i.e., deductible and out-of-pocket status, copays, and coinsurance). This ensures the maximum credible estimate and prevents collection problems that result from an estimated bill being significantly different than the patient's final bill.

The size of the deposit that a hospital requests will vary according to hospital policy and each person's ability to pay. The propensity-to-pay classification can also play a role in calculating the deposit amount. For example, if an affluent patient has avoided paying medical bills in the past, the counselor might be prompted to ask for a larger deposit before the service is rendered. Again, technology can be used to calculate the recommended deposit automatically.

Many patients will not be able to pay off their balances all at once. An advanced self-pay collection program can calculate an appropriate monthly payment amount based on the patient's ability and willingness to pay. Again, each hospital should set its own payment schedule parameters, using its knowledge of local conditions. For example, the amount that patients with a certain income can pay might vary from region to region, depending on differences in the cost of living.

After determining the appropriate amount to collect, the hospital should make it easy for the patient to pay. When hospitals provide multiple payment options, both up-front and post-service, including credit and debit cards, e-checks, payment plans, and online payment, they increase the self-pay collection rate and lower the costs of collecting. Wherever possible, monthly payments can automatically be processed by debiting the patient's bank account or credit card.

Finally, after all insurance payments have come in, the hospital billing staff must reconcile them with the estimated bill that has been presented to the patient. Hospitals need to establish internal policies on how and when a bill estimate will be adjusted. For example, they might not revise the estimate if the insurance payment is 10% to 20% less than the estimate, but will change it if it's more than 20% less. If the payment is more than the estimate, the hospital has to send the patient a new statement and adjust the monthly payments.

Automation can determine charity and aid status

Many hospitals lack adequate staff to identify patients who might qualify for charity or other financial aid opportunities. For some hospitals, this is both a significant revenue issue and a community relations problem. Use of a propensity-to-pay score and other automated screening solutions can help flag those patients who should be evaluated for other sources of coverage, such as Medicaid, victims-of-crime programs, disability insurance (part of Social Security), or other state or private programs. Nationally, about a quarter of the uninsured—about 12 million people—are eligible for public health insurance programs but are not enrolled, according to the National Institute for Health Care Management.

Technology to automate this patient advocacy process should be adopted as part of the pre-service and point-of-service registration processes. For example, registration staff should be alerted so that they know when to gather information on household composition and income for an automated charity status determination. If the system determines the patient to be charity-eligible, a charity form can be automatically generated for the patient's signature prior to service.

When a hospital seeks to improve its self-pay collection policies, automation is the key to ensuring that hospital policies are followed and that the burden on staff is minimized. This does not eliminate the human interaction that is indispensable to achieving the desired outcome and to ensuring patient satisfaction. But it does make the process much easier for both patients and staff. And, by helping patients pay their bills, hospitals can actually improve their community image while boosting their self-pay collections.


Keith Mertz is Director of Product Management at RelayHealth. He can be reached at Keith.Mertz@RelayHealth.com.
For information on how you can contribute to HealthLeaders Media online, please read our Editorial Guidelines.

Tagged Under:


Get the latest on healthcare leadership in your inbox.