ACO Payments May Hinge More on Geography than Quality
Location! Location! Location! When it comes to Accountable Care Organizations, the federal government is borrowing the adage from realtors that says it’s not so much the house as the neighborhood.
A study in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that the shared-savings payments that participating providers receive in the Medicare Pioneer and Shared Savings ACO programs might be more dependent upon geography than performance.
"There is a lot of variability in how favorable the payment methodology would be to organizations across the country because spending growth varies so much across different areas," J. Michael McWilliams, MD, a co-author of the study, tells HealthLeaders Media.
"Also we found it is likely these losses or gains would be unrelated to any organizational effort to improve quality of care and lower costs," says McWilliams, a general internist and assistant professor of healthcare policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School.
"It will probably even out over a few years for any given organizations but for half of them it will persist over time and it presents a pretty large gamble to perspective ACOs."
"If you happen to be in an area with high spending growth, your spending target will be well below that," he says. "And even if you do a good job, you might not quite get there. You might lose money or at the very least you might not get the shared savings that reflect your true performance relative to what spending would have been."
- Governors Push to Expand Role of PAs, Telemedicine
- 3 More Pioneer ACOs Say They Will Quit
- Ebola in the U.S.: Reason to Fear, to Hope, to Prepare
- Why Open Payments Irks Physicians
- Top Provider Billing Mistakes Are Changing
- Difficult Patients: It's Not Them, It's You, Doctor
- Overcoming a Payer Mix 'Nightmare'
- Employee Engagement: Make It Meaningful
- These Algorithms Reduce Readmissions
- Payer Calls for More Primary Care Docs, Team Care