Is HHS Compromising with Insurers?
Pardon the football analogy, but it's fall:
It's fourth and ten and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is just out of field goal range. They've been driving hard to an end zone with the words "Affordable Care Act" painted in big letters, but with a comfortable lead and plenty of time on the clock, the smart thing to do is, of course, to punt.
That's exactly what HHS did with the ACA's current 800-pound gorilla: ensuring children with preexisting conditions can get healthcare coverage.
In an October 13 letter from Secretary Sebelius to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), HHS attempted to stem the recent trend among healthcare payers to drop "child only" health plans by clarifying policies that aren't explicitly forbidden by the Act.
Among those clarifications, HHS says insurers are within their rights to (if permitted by state laws):
- Maintain separate "child-only" policies separate from closed policies;
- Penalize members that drop coverage and subsequently reapply;
- Set the number and length of open enrollment periods; and
- Adjust rates based on members' health status.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement