CMS Denies Florida's MLR Waiver Request
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services denied on Thursday Florida's medical loss ratio waiver request to allow health insurers more time to meet new MLR standards. CMS rejected Florida's argument that meeting the new 80% requirement would destabilize the state's individual market and cause insurers to withdraw.
In the waiver request filed with CMS in March 2011, Florida officials asked for an adjustment of the MLR standard to 68%, 72%, and 76% for 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively.
At issue is a requirement in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that health insurers spend no more than 15% to 20% of their premium dollars on administrative expenses. The idea is to limit administrative spending so that 80 cents to 85 cents of every premium dollar is spent on patient medical care.
Health insurers that don't meet the MLR requirement will have to pay a rebate to their members. That's money insurers are anxious to hold onto, so they have appealed to their state departments of insurance to request state waivers to delay implementation of the MLR requirement.
Steve Larsen, director of the CMS Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, noted in a press conference that with more than 20 carriers Florida has a very competitive individual health insurance market and that the state provided no evidence that meeting the 80% standard would create a hardship for the insurers.
"Most of them already meet that standard and the ones that don't are sufficiently profitable to provide rebate payments," he said.
Larsen also took issue with Florida's contention that four health insurance providers will leave the state if the 80% MLR rate was upheld. He noted that based on enrollment, none of the insurers would even be subject to the MLR rebate requirement in the first place.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement