Weak Link Found Between Readmissions, Mortality
Hospital and policy leaders who complain that federal penalties for higher 30-day readmissions may have the unintended consequence of leading to more patient deaths, or that liberal readmissions practices actually prevent mortality, are largely incorrect.
That's the conclusion from Yale University School of Medicine readmission expert Harlan Krumholz, MD, and colleagues, as reported in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.
"Some researchers have raised concerns that hospital mortality rates and readmission rates might have an inverse relationship, such that hospitals with lower mortality rates are more likely to have higher readmission rates," Krumholz and colleagues wrote. "Interventions that improve mortality might also increase readmission rates by resulting in a higher-risk group being discharged from the hospital."
Additionally, there have been concerns that measuring either readmissions or measuring mortality means measuring basic quality of care, and that measuring both would be redundant.
And there are concerns that readmissions "could be 'adversely' affected by a competing risk of death—a patient who dies during the index episode of care can never be readmitted," wrote Eiran Z. Gorodeski, MD, and colleagues in a 2010 article in the New England Journal of Medicine.
- Ebola: Health Officials Try to Quell Front Line Fears
- Reducing Readmissions Starts with Better Collaboration
- Ebola: A New Normal in Dallas
- Partners HealthCare M&A Deal Under Scrutiny
- Readmissions: No Quick Fix to Costly Hospital Challenge
- How Educated Nurses Save Money
- As virus spreads, insurers exclude Ebola from new policies
- 'Overtreatment' Debate Circles Back to Lung Cancer Screening
- Defensive Medicine Still Prevalent Despite Tort Reform
- After Ebola patient cured, NE hospital takes cautions anew