First PCORI Report Short on Specifics
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute issued its heavily anticipated first report on national priorities Monday, but stopped short of specifying any diseases or conditions that many hoped or feared the $4.5 billion agency would target for comparative effectiveness research.
Rather, the brief, 22-page "Draft National Priorities for Research and Research Agenda, Version 1," merely carries general statements, which allude to five broad categories the 21-person Board of Governors believes address deficits in methods of research, rather than research on drug or procedure efficacy.
For example, there is no mention of any issues outlined in the Institute of Medicine's report, 100 Initial Priority Topics for Comparative Effectiveness Research from 2009.
"Well, you may say, why didn't you list a few?" Harlan Krumholz, MD, one of PCORI governors, rhetorically asks in an interview with HealthLeaders Media after the report's release Monday.
"Rather than say, well, you know people with A-fib, they have a more important decision than people with breast cancer or people with multiple sclerosis have a more important opportunity than people with Parkinson... We didn't want to exclude particular patient groups or particular questions."
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives
- AMA Pushes Lame Duck Congress for SGR Repeal
- In PCMH, the 'P' is Not for 'Physician'