SGIM Calls for End to Fee-For-Service
Fee-for-service medicine is a financially unsustainable payment model that should be phased out by the end of the decade, a study commissioned by the Society for General Internal Medicine recommends.
The study released Monday by SGIM's National Commission of Physician Payment Reform calls for an aggressive five-year transition into blended payment models such as patient-centered medical homes or accountable care organizations that reward outcomes quality and value. During the transition, the commission said fee-for-service would be "recalibrated" to correct payment inequalities for services such as evaluation and management.
Commission Chairman, Steven A. Schroeder, MD, professor of health and healthcare at the University of California, San Francisco, says he went into the year-long project last March thinking that fix fee-for-service could be fixed, but concluded after months of study that an aggressive phase-out makes more sense.
"It's so complicated to fix it and we've been trying for 30 years," Schroeder tells HealthLeaders Media.
"It promotes higher volume, and because the valuations tend to be huge, to create more high-tech things. It changes the mix of services that a physician provides because there is such a gray area in healthcare. At the margins it creates incentives to do more costly things."
- How Top-Ranked MA Plans Earn Their Stars
- Readmissions: No Quick Fix to Costly Hospital Challenge
- How Hospitals Can Become 'Upstreamists'
- 4 Ways to Lower the Cost to Collect from Self-Pay Patients
- House Calls Key to Pioneer ACO Success
- How Telehealth Pays Off for Providers, Patients
- 4 Tips for Managing Employed Physicians
- Defensive Medicine Still Prevalent Despite Tort Reform
- WellPoint Dominates Nearly Half of Markets, AMA Says
- 'Overtreatment' Debate Circles Back to Lung Cancer Screening