Magazine
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

The Patient of the Future

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Media, September 10, 2009
Are you a health leader?
Qualify for a free subscription to HealthLeaders magazine.

This article appears in the September 2009 issue of HealthLeaders magazine.

Physicians suggest. Patients ignore. Technology alone won't bring them together. But a new relationship just might.

A patient enters the waiting room and is greeted warmly by her personal navigator, who hands her a tablet-sized computer preloaded with her personal demographic information and health records. She answers a series of questions and the computer compiles a list of possible diagnoses for her physician.

In his office, the physician is reading an e-mail from a patient who has forwarded an interesting study about his particular medical condition. The physician forwards the study to the rest of the patient's care team, including the patient's acupuncturist.


LIVE Webcast
Lower Costs, Boost Productivity in Your ED
April 30, 1PM - 2:30PM ET


Increase emergency department throughput & decrease cost. Join us for proven ED cost-reduction and efficiency improvement strategies from three ED leaders. This customizable webcast allows you to pre-submit questions to our speakers to help guide the discussion, and ensure you get the answers your organization needs.
>>Register Now


In the exam room, a specialist and patient sit together in front of a computer—the physician is showing the patient which sites have the most reliable medical information that she can use to learn more about her recent diagnosis. Next door, a physician is talking to a patient who has unusual symptoms; the doctor consults her PDA, which is loaded with a decision-support application.

Down the hall, an employee e-mails to a prospective patient a detailed, itemized list comparing the costs of hip replacement surgery at a number of area hospitals.

And, by the way, everyone in the waiting room is fit and trim. Nobody smokes anymore. People with diabetes check their blood sugar regularly. Everyone shows up for their colonoscopy appointments. People are knowledgeable about their health, empowered to participate as partners in their care, and engaged enough to comply with their physicians' directives.

Scoff if you want, but in many ways the patient of the future is already here. Obstacles include the current reimbursement model and patients themselves. But physicians also deserve a large chunk of the blame. "I'm impressed how well the medical profession has inadvertently trained patients not to be engaged," says Ted Eytan, MD, medical director for delivery systems operations improvement at The Permanente Federation LLC in Washington, DC, which supports the Medical Groups of Kaiser Permanente. If you go to the doctor and you're sick, they'll ask, "Why did you wait so long?" And if patients aren't sick enough, they say, "You came in too soon." Whenever the patient comes in is the right time, Eytan says. We have to get patients comfortable with saying "I deserve more. I want to be healthy. I want to help manage my care and my health. I want to see every piece of data you have."

Technology connects patients and providers
In the future, patients will communicate with their doctors via e-mail, online chat room, Web portal, mobile device, remote monitoring technology (or some other method or medium that hasn't yet been invented), thus avoiding a long wait for a short appointment that might not have been necessary anyway.

Doctors don't get paid for phone or e-mail consultations, nor do they want to risk missing a diagnosis because they chatted online instead of face-to-face with a patient. Engage on a personal level? Physicians have five to 10 minutes to see a patient, listen to his or her complaints, make a clinical decision and move on to the next appointment.

There is an entire generation that has never known a world without computers—and their parents and grandparents are picking up their habits, chatting on their mobile phones, learning how to attach photos to e-mails, signing up for Facebook accounts, and looking up health information online in numbers too large to ignore. A huge portion of the population can't imagine life without Google or text messages. And they can't understand why healthcare hasn't embraced technology, too.

Neither can Art Papier, MD, a dermatologist who is on the faculty at the University of Rochester (NY). "If you ran the aviation system this way, some pilots would use all the modern navigation, and some pilots would put their finger out the window," says Papier, who is cofounder of Logical Images, a medical software company in Rochester, NY. "That's what we're tolerating in medicine."

What is one of the biggest barriers to technology such as decision-support tools? Doctors don't want to look dumb. If they have to look up information, they worry the patient will realize they are not omniscient after all.

In fact, the opposite is true, many argue. Obviously, physicians cannot read every study or know about every single new treatment option or medication. And today's patients are impressed by physicians who embrace technology. So looking up the answers doesn't make the doctor look dumb—it makes them look modern and tech-savvy.

"A whole bunch of improvements that have happened over the past 30 years with IT in other industries are going to evolve in healthcare and that will result in transformation as to how the whole process will work," says Dave deBronkart, an advocate for patient engagement and empowerment and communication as well as patient-caregiver collaboration.

Patients prefer providers who use Internet-based tools to augment care, according to Deloitte's 2009 survey of healthcare consumers. More than half (55%) want to communicate with their doctors via e-mail to exchange health information and get answers to questions, for example. And 68% are interested in remote monitoring devices that allow self-monitoring of their condition and electronic reporting of results to their physician. The figure was even higher for seniors (78%) and consumers with chronic conditions (75%).

One recent IT development has sprung from the nation's obsession with cell phones and applications. Mobile health, or m-health, allows patients and physicians to perform a variety of healthcare-related tasks. Phones and PDAs can collect community and clinical health data and deliver it to physicians, researchers, and patients. They can help track the spread infectious diseases such as swine flu and the rates of conditions such as diabetes. Patient monitoring devices emit real-time vital signs to caregivers.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

4 comments on "The Patient of the Future"


Rebecca Roe (4/20/2012 at 10:23 AM)
I love the idea of connected services in relation to patient information, websites, all patient data in one location to be viewed at the same time. But I have a question when the computer service is down, when power surges interrupt the process etc, someone hacks the servers, what happens to the flow of the day? I'm always so afraid that we put all our eggs in one basket and then when things don't work perfectly then we become somewhat paralyzed. We all know how that works in our personal world, but what about as a patient? Do I cancel my appointment and wait for a better day?

Nancy Hughes (4/20/2012 at 9:22 AM)
I was not familiar with PAM until I read this article. It makes perfect sense. Patient-centered care is respect for the patient's personal needs, and the most effective care occurs when the patient's predicaments, rights, and preferences are taken into consideration.

Dan Stone (4/18/2012 at 6:09 PM)
Indeed a great read! Some thoughts for you to consider. Some background first... I provide technologies for home care agencies designed to improve the delivery of care for seniors at home. Our products detect wandering, provide remote vital sign monitoring and even help caregivers understand certain ADL's when a senior is home alone. If something abnormal is detected, an instant email or text is generated and sent to the network of care givers. These tools have proven to increase care plan adherence and patient interactions levels. The results are simple, fewer hospitalizations. I am perplexed however. I have found that home care agencies are resistant to leverage these products. They feel these products facilitate "rationed care" or potentially take away from billable hours at home. My favorite is "you can't replace care with a computer" Indeed that is not the case nor would we ever claim such a silly thing. My question is: How can we encourage professional home care agencies to leverage these devices as a part of their offering? Would you hire a home care agency to look care for you mother that used these tools to help deliver care? What are your thoughts? Feel free to reach out. Dan Stone- Assured Independence / dstone@assuredindependence.com