New Joint Commission's Medical Staff Bylaws Standard Strikes Balance
Medical staffs across the country have been waiting for more than three years for The Joint Commission to commit to standard MS.01.01.01 (formerly MS.1.20), and the day has finally come. Medical staffs in Joint Commission-accredited hospitals will need to comply with MS.01.01.01 as of March 31, 2011.
MS.01.01.01 has been through several revisions, the first of which, when issued in 2007, sent medical staffs into an uproar. One of the issues that came up for debate was which documents could be included in the medical staff bylaws and which could be kept in supporting documents, such as medical staff policies and procedures.
Medical staffs protested that if every medical staff process was included in the bylaws, the entire medical staff would need to vote on relatively simple decisions, taking up too much time and too many resources.
Many medical staffs also expressed discontent that the 2007 standard allowed the medical staff to bypass the medical executive committee and go straight to the governing board if they felt that the medical executive committee was not adequately representing the medical staff's needs. Some argued that this change undermined the authority of the medical executive committee, whose job is to represent the medical staff to the hospital's governing board.
The draft of the standard that passed this week strikes a balance between what The Joint Commission wants to include in its standard and what the field thinks is reasonable. Many medical staffs were afraid that they would need to extract processes and procedures from their supporting documents and include them in the bylaws to comply with MS.01.01.01. Although it sounds pretty simple, the medical staff would then need to vote each addition into the bylaws, and all it takes is one person to hold up that process.
The way the current standard is written, medical staffs may choose to include the key provisions in a brief summary of, say, their fair hearing processes in the bylaws, but include all of the details in supporting documents, says Ann O'Connell, Esq., with the Sacramento, CA office of Nossaman, LLP. O'Connell has served for the past few years on the MS.01.01.01 task force.
"I think there are a variety of ways to implement the changes. It could range from totally revamping the bylaws and incorporating your extraneous documents into your bylaws, or it could mean that you leave them in separate documents, but summarize the key requirements within your bylaws," says O'Connell.
Also, according to O'Connell, as long as the key requirements are addressed in the bylaws, The Joint Commission staff has assured the task force that it does not intend to micromanage what comprises a "detail" for purposes of implementing the standard.
O'Connell explains that when it comes to the medical staff bypassing the medical executive committee and going straight to the board, The Joint Commission compromised there too. Whereas the 2007 standard allowed the medical staff to directly address the board regarding just about anything, the new standard limits the medical staff to approaching the board regarding amendments to the bylaws, policies and procedures, and rules and regulations only—and it does require the medical staff to present its proposed changes to the MEC first (but MEC approval is not a prerequisite to getting the proposal to the board).
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows