Most Medical Boards 'Terrible' at Discipline
By the time the Medical Board of California filed a petition to revoke the license of Michael Jackson's doctor this month—three years after the pop icon died—public complaints were common. Chief among them: What took so long?
It was shortly after Jackson's death that critics started pounding the medical board for failing to quickly revoke physician Conrad Murray's license, or at least seek an interim suspension, after the doctor was charged with illicitly administering anesthesia to the performer, who had wanted to overcome insomnia.
The Jackson case was certainly high-profile, but it is only one of many across the country in which medical boards have failed to act expeditiously, or even at all, against bad doctors.
Earlier this month, a New England investigative reporting group published a story about the Massachusetts Board of Medicine, describing a "veil of secrecy" afforded to some doctors "due to physician-friendly provisions in state law, the board's policy of purging certain records, sometimes in violation of state law, and outdated technology."
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- CDC Warns of Antibiotic Overuse in Hospitals
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- HIMSS: Software Bugs, Shifting Alliances Unsettling for CIOs
- AHRQ: Surgical Admissions Bring 48% of Hospital Revenue
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers
- Hospitals Adapting Amid Continued Drug Shortages
- Steep Drop Seen in Medically Unnecessary C-Sections