Killer Metric Separates Good Hospitals From Bad
A hospital's low 30-day mortality rates for three key diagnoses might be an indicator of good survival rates for patients who receive hospital treatment for other conditions as well, researchers say.
How can you tell a good hospital from a bad hospital? Aside from anecdotal information about bad coffee and surly nurses, we now have actual data to help make the distinction.
Roughly three months from now starting Oct. 1, the second wave of value-based incentive payments—or penalties as some hospital providers prefer to call them—kick in.
And for the first time, 25% of the score affecting 1.25% of a hospital's Medicare payments will depend on how well those providers kept certain patients alive for at least 30 days after discharge.
The risk-adjusted measure, however, only counts those patients admitted for heart failure, pneumonia, or heart attack, which represent only 13% of all senior hospitalizations and which are the only ones currently reported on Hospital Compare.
Under authority of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, federal regulators picked these diagnoses because researchers believe that better care practices keyed to those conditions, can keep those patients alive longer.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- A Fresh Look at End-of-Life Care
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- 3 in 4 Patients Want E-mail Consultations
- Heart Attack Patient Costs Skyrocket Beyond 30 Days
- ACGME Chief Sees 'Huge' Risk of Error in Proposed Assistant Physician Licensure
- 3 Insider Tips on Cutting Costs without Strangling Growth