What's Wrong With Healthcare Quality Measures? Part I
We need to measure the hell out of healthcare to help us compare one organization or system with others. I believe measuring quality helps healthcare systems improve. But I also believe that we can measure healthcare quality a lot better than we do.
If you really think about it, the way we measure hospital quality of care is pretty darn primitive. That's what I've concluded after a few days contemplating today's methods and practice of measurement.
The way we think we know how good we are at providing high value care is really flawed.
Please don't get me wrong. We need to measure the hell out of healthcare to help us compare one organization or system with others. Yes, it can be painful and stunning to realize competing hospitals have figured out how to do things better. I believe measuring quality helps healthcare systems improve.
But we have a ton of work to do to make our evaluations meaningful to leaders, to providers, to patients, and to the public. With the system as it is, too many organizations just use this imperfection as grounds for inattention.
- CEO Exchange: Preparing for Population Health
- Advocate, NorthShore Deal Would Create 16-Hospital System
- Better HCAHPS Scores Protect Revenue
- Narrow Networks Cut Costs, Not Quality, Economists Say
- 3 Strategies for Retaining Millennial Employees
- Power of price: In South FL and the nation, healthcare costs often are shrouded in secrecy
- Two NY hospitals to offer free hip and knee replacement surgeries for qualifying patients in December
- Hospital mergers may lead to higher prices
- Healthcare data of 1 million NJ patients compromised since 2009
- 'Early Offer' Malpractice Programs May Spur Reform