Rural Healthcare Needs the ACA
Is this population sicker than its urban/suburban/exurban counterparts? Does it need these surgeries at greater rates than its urban/suburban/exurban counterparts? Is there a true medical need for 30% more knee replacement surgeries, or do Medicare reimbursements enter into the "to cut, or not to cut" decision-making process?
The study looked only at Medicare recipients, which usually covers persons age 65 and older, so it's logically sound to presume that this population is sicker. This group might also tend to delay getting care because of limited access to providers and/or other reasons (cost, for example).
Treatment delays, of course, may exacerbate certain conditions, speeding a patient's course toward surgery. So perhaps, the finding was not as surprising as on first glance.
Concerns about poor access to rural healthcare services, and the costs associated with private payers are very real. In remarks published in the Kansas City Star last week, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius spoke in defense of the Affordable Care Act:
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Uncompensated Care Faces a Double Hit in Some States
- Hospital Pricing Transparency a Marketing Game Changer
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely