CMS Unveils Billing, Coding Guidance
When the newsletter covers the issue of "inpatient hospital services—heart failure and shock (DRG 127) criteria for inpatient care not met," she says. Which is the same issue as the pacemaker cases being not medically necessary—they don't mention condition code 44. Instead they focus on sections of the Program Integrity Manual related to documentation, Hoy adds.
"It seems that CMS is looking at these situations differently even though they are both issues of medical necessity of inpatient care because they reference condition code 44 in the pacemaker section, whereas the heart failure and shock section seems to focus on documentation." Hoy says.
Potentially confusing guidance aside, there is certainly something to be learned from this issue, and from future editions. In this initial release, for example, CMS suggests that providers review Chapter 6, section 6.5 of the Program Integrity Manual,where you can find all the standards for medical review, and is something hospitals should definitely review because it has been amended over the last year, according to Hoy.
James Carroll is associate editor for the HCPro Revenue Cycle Institute.
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Uncompensated Care Faces a Double Hit in Some States
- Hospital Pricing Transparency a Marketing Game Changer
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Hospitals Profit On Bloodstream Infections