TX Strikes Out on MLR Waiver Request
The CMS letter announcing the decision noted that Texas has a state-operated high-risk pool that provides guaranteed coverage to Texas residents with qualifying medical conditions. "We conclude that the remaining insurers in Texas' robust individual market and the Pool would be able to offer comparable products to the enrollees of any withdrawing issuer," says the letter.
A statement on the TDI web site says, "In denying Texas' application, HHS stated that it took into account each carrier's MLR and profitability…and asserted that few issuers are reasonably likely to exit the individual market in Texas. The department's application clearly showed otherwise.
Of the 34 Texas carriers subject to the law, 23 will pay rebates based on 2010 data; at the 80% MLR threshold, these rebates will absorb the net underwriting profit for the entire individual market.
"HHS' decision does not allow sufficient time for carriers to adjust their operating models, nor does it contemplate the effects on small and mid-level carriers that lack the resources and administrative economies of scale to compete in the individual market under PPACA. A reasonable, responsible phased-in approach would still have afforded rebates to Texas consumers without risking disruption, dislocation and withdrawal of carriers in the individual market. The department will continue to work to ensure the availability of high-quality, high-value health insurance to this important underserved segment of the market."
Texas officials now have 10 days to appeal the CMS decision. Officials at the Texas DOI did not reply to questions regarding any appeal prospects.
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- Size Matters in Antibiotic Overuse
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- CDC Warns of Antibiotic Overuse in Hospitals
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers