Preventing Hospital Readmissions Presents Financial Paradox
Mark Sonneborn, vice president of information services at the Minnesota Hospital Association, says these hospitals are well aware of the financial dilemma, but are nonetheless committed to preventing readmissions.
"First and foremost we consider readmissions to be [an indication of] suboptimal care, even though in a fee-for-service way of doing things, a hospital is paid for doing both the admission and readmission," he says.
"Even with Medicare penalties, a CFO could do the calculations and find it is still worth it to have the readmission despite the penalty… There is still some wariness that we are not there yet, and haven't really shifted from a fee-for-service to a value-based payment structure. There is a worry about shifting too soon in terms of the bottom line, but everyone agrees this is the right thing to do."
Sonneborn's take on the readmissions conundrum rang true to me. At a recent meeting with three health system CEOs, I heard lots of conversation about the financial challenge created by preventing readmissions while still operating in a predominately fee-for-service world. Although all three were clearly concerned about the money, they kept coming back to one point: It's about doing what is best for the patient.
This is also the theme I heard when I spoke to a few of the hospitals that are taking part in the RARE Campaign.
- CEO Exchange: Preparing for Population Health
- EHR Systems 'Immature, Costly,' AMA Says
- Better HCAHPS Scores Protect Revenue
- Advocate, NorthShore Deal Would Create 16-Hospital System
- Narrow Networks Cut Costs, Not Quality, Economists Say
- 3 Strategies for Retaining Millennial Employees
- 'Early Offer' Malpractice Programs May Spur Reform
- Interstate Medical Licensure Effort Advances
- Power of price: In South FL and the nation, healthcare costs often are shrouded in secrecy
- Two NY hospitals to offer free hip and knee replacement surgeries for qualifying patients in December