Public Plan, Co-ops Remain on Health Reform Plate
But will the use of insurance co-operatives be the logical solution to expand insurance coverage without creating a government agency--that Republicans oppose?
Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), who initially proposed the co-op alternative to the public plan, told "Face the Nation" on Sunday that it is clear that in the Senate, "the public option does not have the votes."
"It does provide not for profit competition to insurance companies, so it has appeal on both sides. It’s the only proposal that has bipartisan support and if we’re going to get 60 votes we're going to need bipartisan support," he said.
But last week, indicators were appearing that Republicans may also oppose the co-op idea as well. Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ) called the co-op idea a "Trojan horse" and encouraged his fellow Republicans not to vote for any healthcare bill.
Janice Simmons is a senior editor and Washington, DC, correspondent for HealthLeaders Media Online. She can be reached at jsimmons@healthleadersmedia.com.
- New Facebook Page Gathers Stories of Medical Harm
- Urologists 'Outraged' Over PSA Test Challenge
- Five Hospitals Share Three Secrets to Improve Knee Surgery Outcomes
- Luxury Hospital Facilities Put Patient Experience First
- Beleaguered Fairview Health CEO to Retire in July
- Heartland Health Joins Mayo Clinic Network
- Challenging Physicians to Help Improve the ED
- Health Insurance Exchanges Put Defined Benefits to the Test
- The Power of Plugged-In Physicians
- For hospitals and insurers, new fervor to cut costs


Comments are moderated. Please be patient.