OIG Warns of Pre-Authorization Violations
2. The hospital would be no payments to physicians, nor would the use of the service imply the pre-authorization request getting approval.
3. Personnel would identify themselves to insurers as employees of the hospital, disclose to insurers the nature of the program, and would provide each doctor a copy of all information it submits to insurers to obtain pre-authorization for that doctor's patients. There would be "little opportunity to influence referrals because patients would have already selected Requestor."
4. The hospital has a legitimate interest in offering uniform pre-authorization services.
The office emphasized that the opinion is limited only to the particular hospital that asked for the opinion, which was keyed to providing pre-authorization approvals to cover diagnostic imaging services.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- 'Mega Boards' Could be Rural Healthcare Disruptor
- HL20: Lee Aase—Who's Behind @MayoClinic
- 1 in 5 Eligible Hospitals Penalized for HACs
- Meaningful Use Payment Adjustments Begin
- 12 Hires to Keep Your Hospital Out of Trouble
- No Boost to NFP Hospital Bond Ratings from Medicaid Expansion
- Ratcheting Up Patient Experience Has a Downside
- HL20: Peter Semczuk, DDS, MPH—Taking on the Big Challenges
- HL20: Rebecca Katz—Cooking Up Sustainable Nourishment
- Top 3 Nursing Lessons of 2014