'Unreasonable' Rate Increase Rule Proposal Scrutinized
HHS announced in February that it would make available nearly $200 million in grants to help states combat "unreasonable premium increases."
The proposed HHS rule sets these parameters:
- Defines "unreasonable"as an excessive increase (above the 10% threshold), an unjustified increase (unsupported by data or documentation) or a discriminatory increase (premium increases are different for individuals with the same risk characteristics such as age and geographic location).
- Permits HHS to conduct the rate review if the state doesn't have the resources or lacks the authority to conduct an effective review.
- Requires insurers to submit a preliminary justification for the rate increase request, including any support data.
- Denies HHS the authority to reject unreasonable rate increases although some states will have that authority.
- Allows insurers to withdraw, reduce or continue with the unreasonable rate increase depending on state laws and regulations.
- Requires an insurer to disclose on its company website any rate increases identified as unreasonable and to provide HHS with a final justification for proceeding with the unreasonable rate increase.
- Allows review information to be posted on the HHS website.
Health plan leaders polled for HealthLeaders Media's Industry Survey 2011, cited "government laws and mandates" as a top driver of healthcare costs, second only to overutilization of services.
HHS is expected to respond to public comments and release a final rule later this year. The Health Affairs brief is available here.
Margaret Dick Tocknell is a reporter/editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Physicians Take SGR Repeal Message to Washington
- CDC Warns of Antibiotic Overuse in Hospitals
- Size Matters in Antibiotic Overuse
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away