Health Plans
e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Health Plan, Provider Partnerships May Trump ACOs

Margaret Dick Tocknell, for HealthLeaders Media, May 2, 2011

He noted that The Everett Clinic, which has participated in demonstration projects for Medicare ACOs since 2005, has decided not to seek certification as an ACO under the Affordable Care Act. Instead the Washington State clinic will move its patients out of traditional Medicare and into the Medicare Advantage managed care program. "They just aren't seeing the financial rewards for taking better care of their patients," explains Parke.

A simpler organization structure is among the chief advantages of an integrated delivery system partnering providers with health plans. The rules aren't final, but ACOs will need to be a legal entity of some sort and agree to participate in the program for three years. Also, there are some legal challenges to overcome so the ACO can allocate start-up costs between the hospital and physicians. Physicians will need to have at least 5,000 Medicare fee-for-service patients.

According to the brief, there are fewer legal impediments to sharing expenses and allocating financial risk when a health plan is the intermediary between providers and beneficiaries. As part of a partnership, the health plan can provide the administrative and financial support necessary for the startup.

1 | 2 | 3

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Health Plan, Provider Partnerships May Trump ACOs"


Mike Barrett (5/2/2011 at 10:21 AM)
There is an interesting juxtaposition of demanding great precision in a care process, but not providing any precision on a population basis. Clearly the message is do the care process on all patients, accept the fuzziness on financial/reporting metrics. The net result is trying to advocate for the environment described in the draft regulations to a Board of Directors/Trustees as career limiting compared to a "wait and see" for both final regulations, success/failure, what ever else the policy types will come up with for the next alternative. I think the provider segment is genuinely disappointed that the draft regulations describe a "bridge too far." One can only speculate as to why CMS established such a hard journey compared to all the other paths.