MedPAC Votes to Kill SGR
- Cuts to Medicare Part D drug plans (32%)
- Post–acute care facilities (21%)
- Medicare beneficiaries (14%)
- Hospitals (11%), labs (9%)
- Durable medical equipment (6%)
- Medicare Advantage plans (5%)
- Other providers (2%)
MedPac first unveiled the proposal in September and it was greeted with a resounding thud.
MedPAC's proposal brought howls of protests from the American Medical Association.
"The recommendation voted on today by MedPAC flies in the face of their previous recommendations to stop harmful physician cuts that threaten access to care for patients," AMA President Peter W. Carmel, MD, said in prepared remarks.
"There is already a 20% gap between Medicare payment updates and the cost of providing healthcare to seniors. Many physicians may also face upcoming payment penalties related to electronic prescribing, health information technology and quality reporting programs. Adding additional physician payment cuts to this mix will leave many physicians unable to care for Medicare patients or make the investments needed to participate in new models of care that can increase coordination and reduce costs."
The American Hospital Association this week told MedPAC that it should stop punishing hospitals – which are already facings cuts of $155 billion in reimbursement cuts over 10 years under the Affordable Care Act.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement